Legal Opinion
Rose v. Baystate Medical Center, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 25, 1997No. CIV.A. 96-30054-MAPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, without opposition. The motion of defendant BMC is ALLOWED and judgment will enter accordingly. The motion of defendant Ott is DENIED without prejudice; count II is hereby remanded to state court.
So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 29 and SO)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Elizabeth D. Rose (“Plaintiff”) filed a claim against Bay State Medical Center (“BMC”) and Jeffrey Ott (“Ott”) (together “Defendants”) with the Equal…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Delgado Graulau v. Pegasus CommunicationsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001
- Cox v. Maine State PoliceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Sauer v. Universal, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998