Legal Opinion

Smeeth v. Perkins & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 15, 1903No. 32PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decree of the Circuit Court dismissing the complainants’ bill in equity, brought for an alleged infringement of letters patent No. 452,618, dated May 19, 1891, for an improvement in bosh-plates for furnaces, granted to James Scott, and of which the complainants in the bill became owners.

The specification of the patent states that the “invention consists of an improvement in the setting of bosh-plates in the wall of a blast furnace and in an improved construction of the bosh-plates themselves” ; that heretofore, for the purpose of preventing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Klein v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Sewall v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Krajewski v. PharrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. Ruby Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Manhattan General Const. Co. v. Helios-Upton Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Delaware Seamless Tube Co. v. Shelby Steel Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  4. Albright v. LangfeldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Smeeth v. Fox Copper & Bronze Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API