City of Grants Pass v. Hamelin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Employer seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it must pay compensation for conditions that it mistakenly accepted in an updated notice of acceptance issued at the time of claim closure. The facts are undisputed. We review the board’s order for errors of law and affirm.
In 2003, employer was directed by an administrative law judge (ALJ) to accept claimant’s “undefined” bilateral upper extremity condition, and thereafter, in April and November 2003, it accepted bilateral wrist tendinitis. In June 2004, employer denied claimant’s request for acceptance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Oregon Racing Commission v. Multnomah Kennel ClubOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- SAIF Corp. v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shearer's Foods v. HoffnagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017