Harris v. Monroe Building & Loan Ass'n

On Rehearing.

ROGERS, Justice.

Alleging that she is the owner of 75 shares of the par value of $200 a share of its full-paid dividend stock, plaintiff sued the Monroe Building & Loan Association for $225, as the unpaid dividends due on the stock for the months of July, August, and September, 1932. Without answering to the merits, the defendant filed a plea of estoppel, alleging that as plaintiff had plac ed her stock on the withdrawal list she was estopped from suing the association, except for a violation or enforcement of the provisions of Act No. 140 of 1932. Specifically, the plea of…