Legal Opinion
Bearley v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 17, 2004No. CIV.A. 3:CV-02-1526PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Friendly Ice Cream Corporation’s (hereinafter Friendly’s) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff Dorothy Bearley is alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. Friendly’s motion will be granted with respect to the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans With Disabilities Act, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. 1367.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Giansante & Cobb, LLC v. Singh (In Re Singh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Jakomas v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Sampson v. Methacton School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- In Re South Canaan Cellular Investments, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Schlifke v. Trans World Entertainment Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.