Legal Opinion
In re Miller
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 9, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
It appears that specifications of objections were filed by the trustee to the discharge of the bankrupt. The referee finds that no meeting of the creditors was ever called on the application of any creditor for the purpose of obtaining authority for the trustee to interpose objections to the bankrupt’s discharge,' and that, at the time the specifications of objections were filed, the trustee had not been authorized to do so at any meeting called for that purpose. It appears that the trustee was not advised as to the pending application of the bankrupt for discharge…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Buckeye Coal & Railway Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rash v. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- In re HockmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
- In re SlatkinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rasmussen v. GreslyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Dickinson v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- In re WeinstockDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1936
- In re LippDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1937