Legal Opinion
In re Weinstock
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1936No. 27641PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion brought on by an order to show cause why an order should not be made vacating and setting aside the discharge of the bankrupt and permitting Samuel Rapoport, a creditor, to file specifications.
The bankrupt was in a prior proceeding granted a discharge on June 4, 1930.
On February 19, 1935 the bankrupt filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy.
Samuel Rapoport was one of the creditors scheduled.
A first meeting was held by the Referee on notice to creditors at his office on March 7, 1935.
There were no assets in the bankrupt’s estate.
On February 18, 1936,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re LittleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
- Gilbert v. ShouseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- In re JordanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
- Ziskin v. AptakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- In re HaaseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McGee v. Southern Pacific CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- In Re SchindlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947