State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Martel Mills Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
The merit of this appeal is made to turn upon whether the Light Company is the original complainant in this proceeding. If so, the notice of appeal was ineffective for the reason it was not served. If not, then the giving of notice by mailing a copy thereof to the Light Company met the requirements of the statute.
A public utility company may make complaint to the Utilities Commission respecting its rate structure. G.S. 62-24, 25. Interested parties may intervene, G.S. 62-24, and any party aggrieved by the final order •of the Commission may appeal. G.S. 62-26.6. The party appealing must serve…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hatch v. Alamance Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Hatch v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Lowman v. . BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- S. Lowman & Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF GREENSBORO v. FarabeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- City of Wilmington v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Orville Young, LLC v. BonacciWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021