Russell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.
California Court of Appeal
Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This appeal is from a judgment rendered and entered in the plaintiff’s favor in an action brought by him to recover the sum of $600 alleged to have become due and payable by virtue of the following state of facts: The plaintiff in the month of October, 1918, was a salaried employee of the defendant upon a month-to-month employment, at a monthly salary of $250, and had been such for several years prior to that time. In October, 1918, the defendant issued to all of its salaried employees the following notice:
“Office Notice #1451
“October 15, 1918.
“To all employees S. F. & L. A.
“Mr................…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Haag v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Duncan v. Cone Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Chinn v. China National Aviation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Scott v. J. F. Duthie & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Thompson v. BurrOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Judd v. WasieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.