Continental Life Ins. Co. v. Newman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellee was plaintiff against an.insurance company as defendant in the circuit court, suing on an accident insurance policy against accidental injuries while he was “traveling as a fare-paying passenger” in a passenger car. Appellee was riding in the mail car, and was on duty as United States postal clerk at the time. Plaintiff recovered in the circuit court, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. The inquiry involves two distinct questions: (1) Whether he was a fare-paying passenger; and (2) whether he was in a passenger car. This court, as pointed out in the opinion of the Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Travelers' Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Wood v. General Accident Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
- Bogart v. Standard Life & Accident Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Burns v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948
- Continental Life Ins. Co. v. NewmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928