Legal Opinion
Wood v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Philadelphia
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 1, 1908No. 43PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALEAS, Circuit Judge.
In the court below the plaintiff in error brought an action against the defendant in error on a policy of accident insurance, which contained a clause as follows:
“In case a beneficiary other than the insured or his legal representatives is specifically named in the schedule of warranties indorsed on this policy, *927then and not otherwise this policy shall also, in consideration of the premium, insure the person named as beneficiary in the said schedule as follows: Against any one of the following losses, resulting within ninety days from date of accident and caused solely…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Koshland v. Columbia InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Boles v. Royal Union Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Bogart v. Standard Life & Accident Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.