Louisville N. R. Co. v. Bowen
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Appellee recovered a judgment for injuries received on one of appellant’s trains conveying United States mail, while engaged in his duties as a postal clerk thereon. The relation between the plaintiff and defendant was that of carrier and passenger, and it is not questioned that the defendant owed to the plaintiff the same degree of care as was due its passengers. Southern Ry. Co. v. Harrington, 166 Ala. 630, 52 So. 57, 139 Am. St. Rep. 59; 6 Cyc. 542.
There were several exceptions reserved by the defendant to separate portions of the oral charge of the court, and the assignments of error…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Southern Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Mobile Cab & Baggage Co. v. BusbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Cannon v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. ShephardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Mosley v. Teche Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.