Legal Opinion

United States v. Ed Rachal

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1962No. 19701_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

This income tax case involves claims for refunds of $514.71 for 1948 and $5,-263.59 for 1949 under the provisions mitigating the effect of the statute of limitations, Section 3801 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and Sections 1311-1315 of the 1954 Code. In certain circumstances, when an error has been made in the inclusion or exclusion of income or in the allowance or disallowance of a deduction or in the tax treatment of a transaction affecting the basis of property, the error may be corrected even though the statute has run. The purpose of the mitigating provisions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Brennen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  3. H. T. Hackney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  4. MacDonald v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. First Nat. Bank of Philadelphia v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brigham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Herbert Birchenough and Edith Birchenough v. The United States. John J. Hurtz and Julia R. Hurtz v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Chertkof v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  4. Lucy Cocchiara, Wife of and Louis J. Roussel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Glatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API