Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. North Todd Gentry v. Lamar

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 15, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Information in quo warranto filed in this court to Oust respondents from office as directors of alleged Consolidated School, District, designated as ‘ ‘ Consolidated School District No. 1, of Texas .County, Missouri.” Respondents filed return.

The case is submitted on relator’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The validity of the organization of the district is questioned, and the facts determined from the pleadings are as follows:

The resident citizens of the community in which the city of Houston, in the County of Texas, is located, under authority of Section 11259, Revised Statutes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McAllister Ex Rel. Lincoln v. BirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Sanders v. LacksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. State ex inf. Simrall v. ClardySupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. School District v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. State Ex Inf. Thompson v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Rogersville Reorganized School District No. R-4 v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Hopkins v. StemmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Schlafly v. BaumannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Taney County v. Empire District Electric CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API