Legal Opinion

Schlafly v. Baumann

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 26, 1937PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves the validity of a proposed sale of real estate for delinquent taxes under the Jones-Munger Act [Laws 1933, pp. 425-449, Mo. Stat. Ann. (Supp.), p. 7980], as amended [Laws 1933, Ex. Sess., p. 154, sec. 9961].

1. The first assignment of appellant, William F. Baumann, collector of revenue in and for the city of St. Louis, is that the court erred in holding a publication on December 28, 1934, January 4 and 11, 1935, of a notice to sell, on April 8, 1935, Lot 24 of Bell Place, a subdivision of the city of St. Louis, to discharge the lien for delinquent taxes, was null and void…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tax Lien Co. v. . SchultzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Jackson v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. St. Louis County Court v. SparksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
  5. Ex Parte Keane v. StrodtmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Homer v. Dadeland Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Hayes v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Olympia v. PalzerWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Melody FRYE, Respondent, v. Ronald J. LEVY, Director, State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Children’s Division, AppellantSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API