Legal Opinion
State v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 3, 1996No. 35012-9-I, 36767-6-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
Orson Lee and Brian Yates appeal convictions under the stalking statute, RCW 9A.46.110. Appellants contend the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague, and that it violates equal protection and due process. Each appellant also argues there was insufficient evidence to convict. We affirm both convictions.
I
On October 29, 1993, Brian Yates was convicted of stalking in violation of the former RCW 9A.46.110, which provided:(1) A person commits the crime of stalking if, without law ful authority and under circumstances not amounting to a felony attempt of another crime:(a) He or she…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Spence v. KaminskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. SaundersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.