Legal Opinion

Roberts v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Carpenter, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against the city of Detroit, based upon the loss of the services of his wife, who tfas injured by falling upon a defective sidewalk. Money paid for surgical attendance and nursing constituted a part of the damages recovered. The only *66question presented for our consideration is whether he had a right of action.

Municipal corporations, in Michigan, are liable for injuries resulting from their neglect to repair public highways only where made so by statute. That there is no common-law liability was decided in the case of City of Detroit v. Blackeby, 21 Mich. 84,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. BlackebyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Chidsey v. Town of CantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  3. McCutcheon v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. American Transportation Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Reed v. Inhabitants of BelfastSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Heather Lynn Hannay v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Ex Parte MuckenfussCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API