Legal Opinion

United States v. Powell

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 24, 1987No. ACM S27292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

STEWART, Judge.

At a special court-martial the appellant was convicted of attempted wrongful appropriation and forgery contrary to his pleas, and failure to repair in accordance with his pleas. The sentence imposed by the military judge, and approved by the convening authority, included a bad conduct discharge and two months confinement.

The appellant avers that the forgery specification does not state an offense in that the alleged forged document, if true, would not create a legal obligation or impose a legal burden on the recipient of the paper. He also challenges the attempted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. DavisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. ChandlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. EnglishU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. JohnsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. PowellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. PowellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API