Ruonala v. Board of County Commissioners
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This appeal challenges a judgment which the circuit court for Multnomah county entered in favor of the plaintiffs in a mandamus proceeding-. The plaintiffs, ten in number, are deputy constables who are employees of Multnomah county and whose principal duty consists of the service of process issued by the district court for Multnomah county. The defendants are the Board of County Commissioners for Multnomah County, the Multnomah County Civil Service Commission and the members of those two boards. The office of the sheriff of Multnomah county employs six deputy sheriffs whose principal duty is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Riesland v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Mann v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Pratt v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. v. Malheur County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Hammons v. SCHRUNKOregon Supreme Court · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. CRADDOCKOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. CushingOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. CushingOregon Supreme Court · 1969