United States v. Sandoval-Gonzalez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Gerardo Sandoval-Gonzalez was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) for being an alien who reentered the United States after previously being deported. The jury at his trial, however, was not required to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Sandoval was an alien. Instead, the jury was told that “there is a presumption” of his alienage, and the burden of proof was shifted to Sandoval to establish that he had obtained American citizenship by having been born to a U.S. citizen father. We hold that this was error, and, moreover, a prejudicial error. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Rico WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- United States v. Rafiq BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Espinoza-BazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Luis Hernandez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.