Legal Opinion

United States v. Sandoval-Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2011No. 09-50446PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Gerardo Sandoval-Gonzalez was convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) for being an alien who reentered the United States after previously being deported. The jury at his trial, however, was not required to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Sandoval was an alien. Instead, the jury was told that “there is a presumption” of his alienage, and the burden of proof was shifted to Sandoval to establish that he had obtained American citizenship by having been born to a U.S. citizen father. We hold that this was error, and, moreover, a prejudicial error. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Rico WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. United States v. Rafiq BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Espinoza-BazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Luis Hernandez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API