Legal Opinion
Newbern v. Joseph Baker & Co.
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided June 10, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In this opinion the terms plaintiff and defendant will be used as they were in the trial court.
The judgment charged to be erroneous arose out of a foreign attachment sued out by the plaintiff, a Virginia corporation, against a citizen of North Carolina, and has its origin in this contract:
“Norfolk, Virginia, April 20, 1923.
“Mr. Herman Newbern,
“Belcross, N. C.
“We have today purchased from you, your entire crop df cabbage now growing near Belcross, N. C., and which consists of about fourteen acres, for which we agree to pay you one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) per crate, loaded aboard cars at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Day v. . PoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Fisk v. TankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Eastern Ice Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- Vincent v. LelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Van Duyn v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Hughes v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Triplett Lumber Co., Inc. v. PurcellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945