Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. Simmons

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 15, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-3211-KHVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VRATIL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 17) filed September 16, 1999, which plaintiff has not opposed, and plaintiffs motion for a pretrial hearing with an interpreter (Doc. # 16) filed September 14, 1999. Because defendants’ motion for summary judgment is uncontested, the Court sustains the motion. See D.Kan. Rule 7.4 (“If a respondent fails to file a response ... the motion will be considered and decided as an uncontested motion, and ordinarily will be granted without further notice”). Moreover, as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. GusmanDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
  2. Arce v. LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
  3. Sanders ex rel. Rayl v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  4. In re the Custody & Guardianship of La'Asia S.New York City Family Court · 2002
  5. Sanders Ex Rel. Rayl v. KANSAS DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND REHABIL. SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API