Legal Opinion

DeHart v. HomEq Servicing Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 2014No. Civil Action No. 11-416PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*248 Memorandum Opinion

GOLDBERG, District Judge.

On November 9, 2007, Plaintiffs’ home was improperly sold at a sheriffs sale, on the mistaken understanding that Plaintiffs’ mortgage- obligations were in substantial arrears, and that an appropriate foreclosure judgment had been entered several years prior. On December 14, 2007, with the consent of the mortgage company, the sale of the home was set aside, and Plaintiffs were never removed from their home. This lawsuit contends that the Defendants1, who are persons and entities involved in the servicing, lending, and foreclosure at issue, committed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CAMPITELLI v. PLYMOUTH ROCK ASSURANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. De Camara v. BRYN MAWR COLLEGEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. KATZ v. DELUCADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Thompson v. City of WilliamsportDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API