Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. McTigue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, John McTigue and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 16th day of October, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 8th day of November, 1915, denying defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

The plaintiff, as administrator with the will annexed of the goods, etc., of Mary G-. Pinkney, brought this action in ejectment to recover possession of premises in the city of New York included between One Hundred and Fiftieth street on the north, Seventh avenue on the west, and the bulkhead line on the Harlem river on the east. Mary G. Pinkney died December 8, 1908, seized in fee of the premises in question and leaving a will which was admitted to probate December 31, 1908. The testatrix appointed Thomas L. Watt, Archibald Watt and Curtis B. Pierce to be executors and trustees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morse v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Mott v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Dunning v. . Ocean National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Mee v. . GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Cagger v. . LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SpruceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  2. Desiano v. FitzgeraldPeekskill City Court · 2016
  3. McDonald v. SkinnerNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Newborn v. PeartNew York Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API