Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Skinner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, J.:

This is a motion to dismiss a complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff claims that the action is in equity, brought to compel specific performance of a land contract. Defendants insist that the action is at law and that the complaint sets forth only a cause of action for ejectment. The complaint alleges in substance that the defendant Skinner claimed to be the owner of the real property in question free and clear of all liens and incumbrances; that said Skinner entered into a contract with the plaintiff whereby he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Remsen v. New York, Brooklyn & Manhattan Beach Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Kelsey v. McTigueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Hollander v. LustikNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Storandt v. WakeleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API