Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Grand Rapids Cycle Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1895No. Nos. 9494—(223)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The defendant delivered to plaintiff a number of bicycles to sell on 10 per cent, commission. Plaintiff sold 61 of these for $2,731, for which she is entitled to a commission of $273.10. There is also due her $30 for advertising for defendant. She has paid defendant $1,436.75, leaving a balance due defendant of $991.15. Both parties admit these facts. Plaintiff brought this action to recover a commission for assisting defendant to sell a large number of other bicycles to one Field for the price of $11,290, and asked judgment for a balance in excess of said sum of $991.15, after setting off…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Furnell v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
  3. D' Gette v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Olson v. GjertsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Remington v. SavageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Poirier Manufacturing Co. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Morris v. WulkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Schmitt v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API