Schmitt v. Murray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by -plaintiff from an order of tbe municipal court of Mankato, Sbissler, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action in tbe municipal court of tbe city of Mankato to recover for attorney’s fees. ■ Tbe complaint alleges that tbe plaintiff, as an attorney at law, at tbe special request of tbe defendants, performed services for them, of the reasonable value of $350, no part of which has been paid, except tbe sum of $73.25. Tbe summons was not served on the defendant Martin Murray, nor did be answer. The other defendants answered severally, denying that *251they ever employed the plaintiff, and alleging, in effect, that the services were rendered to Martin Murray, who was the principal debtor; that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Harriott v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Lang v. FerrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conrad v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Granite Falls Municipal Hospital v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Kolbe v. BoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Reek v. ReekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931