Legal Opinion

Laidlaw Acquisition Corp. v. Mayflower Group, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 11, 1986No. IP 86-602-CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

DILLIN, District Judge.

The Court having heard evidence on the cross-motions of the parties for a preliminary injunction, now grants the motion of the counterclaim plaintiff.

Laidlaw Transportation Limited is the largest private contractor in the United States engaged in busing school children. Mayflower Group, Inc. is second largest. On May 7, 1986, Laidlaw Acquisition Corp. (Laidlaw) commenced this action by filing its complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Mayflower Group, Inc. (Mayflower), the individual members of Mayflower’s board of directors,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v. Minorco, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v. Anglo American Corp. of South Africa Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EdelmanDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  4. Anago Inc. v. Tecnol Medical Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  5. Anago, Inc. v. Tecnol Medical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API