State v. Buell
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentConnors, J.
I must respectfully dissent.
At the outset, this court, pursuant to a mandatory provision of the statute, is called upon to review a sentence of death imposed upon defendant-appellant for the kidnapping, felonious sexual penetration and murder of a young girl. There is no question but that a heinous crime was committed, but a reviewing court must never let that fact interfere with the due process protections of law afforded an accused.
As reflected in the majority opinion, eyewitness identification of appellant was hazy, inconsistent, and contrary. Photo identification was not positively made…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. George William Brady, and Leroy MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.