United States v. George William Brady, and Leroy Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, George William Brady and Leroy Marshall, were found guilty by a jury of armed bank robbery wherein deaths occurred in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (e). Numerous arguments are raised on appeal, the only colorable ones being that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence photographs of the dead victims and that the introduction of expert testimony concerning microscopic comparisons of hair taken from the body of a victim and hair taken from appellant Marshall was plain error requiring reversal of his conviction. For the reasons stated below, we…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Dennis Essington Green, United States of America v. Daniel S. FranoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Hayward Leslie BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Michael Roberts, United States of America v. Charles Williams, United States of America v. Stanley YelardyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Carl Joseph Baller, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- State v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.