Legal Opinion

Prichard Bros. v. Causey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

These four causes were consolidated and heard together, and involve contests between furnishers of material used in the construction of an apartment house in Memphis, and the holder of a deed of trust on the property improved.

The Chancellor dismissed, the bills, and, upon appeal, his decree was affirmed by the Court of1 Appeals.(l) On April 29,1926, Riverside Realty Company entered into a written contract with Causey for the purchase of the lots upon which the apartment house was later constructed. Causey was to have two weeks within which to examine the title to the lots. The contract price…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bridges v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ragon v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. King v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Harris v. BeasleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Fulghum v. CottonTennessee Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Third National Bank in Nashville v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  2. Thomas v. SetliffeTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Guffey v. CreutzingerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Hercules Machine Co. v. Walker (In re Hercules Machine Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1985
  5. Estate of Joe Boyd MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API