Legal Opinion

Fulghum v. Cotton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Nashville. "Wh E. Cooper, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcEarlaNd, J.

The complainant is a judgment creditor of the defendant, M. C. Cotton, with an execution returned nidia bona, and files this bill charging that said Cotton executed a mortgage conveying certain real estate in Nashville to A. G. Adams, J. M. Hamilton and H. H. McAlister, trustees of the Presbyterian Church, to secure them a loan of $2,500, with eight per cent, interest, the deed containing a power of sale in the event the debt and interest be not paid on or before the 3d of December, 1872; that complainant is informed that the $2,500 remain unpaid, together with some interest and taxes,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standish v. DowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Persons v. AlsipIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  3. White's Creek Turnpike Co. v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. WolfTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. North v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Prichard Bros. v. CauseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Jackson-Lyles Plumbing Co. v. DouglassCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API