Burgess v. Balt. Police Dep't
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*702Specifically, this Court dismissed all claims against Defendant Lehman, the failure to intervene claim against Defendant Goldstein, and any claim based on Defendant Goldstein's alleged fabrication of a gas tank test. (ECF No. 356.) This Court ruled that the following claims would be submitted to the jury:
1. Plaintiff's Brady -based claim that Defendant Goldstein withheld (a) evidence that Brain Rainey was an exculpatory witness and (b) other exculpatory information provided by the FBI as recited in Plaintiff's Trial Exhibits 121 and 122;
2. Plaintiff's due process claim that Defendant…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chestnut v. KincaidDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Dudley v. City of KinstonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Johnson v. GondoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Sardis v. Overhead Door CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.