Legal Opinion
Bakanauskas v. Urdan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1988No. A039697PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Ruth Bakanauskas vacated her apartment in the City of Berkeley (Berkeley) following the filing of an unlawful detainer action against her. By the instant action, she contends her eviction violated (1) the Berkeley Tenants Rights Amendments Act of 1982 (also known as Measure G, codified at Berkeley Mun. Code, § 13.76.010 et seq. 1 ), which restricts tenant evictions to allow for owner occupancy of rental property, and (2) BMC sections 21.52.070 and 19.60.020, which regulate the conversion of rental property to community apartment projects. The trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pennell v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- County of San Diego v. MunizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Vittal v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Adler v. ElphickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cwynar v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Tom v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jun Wai Tom v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Reynolds v. LauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019