Legal Opinion
Perun v. City of Danbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 2013No. AC 34713PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*314 Opinion
2Per curiam
The sole issue presented in this appeal from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) is whether an injury sustained by a police officer when he slipped on a patch of ice in his driveway, as he walked to his motor vehicle to drive to work, is cognizable under our workers’ compensation statutes. We agree with the board that an injury that occurs under these circumstances is not compensable under General Statues § 31-275 (1) (A) (i), (E) (i), and (F), and therefore affirm the decision of the board.1
The relevant facts are undisputed. On the morning of February 16,…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Pasquariello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Martone v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Pizzuto v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Labadie v. Norwalk Rehabilitation Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Fine Homebuilders, Inc. v. PerroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
4Cited by6 opinions
- Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Balloli v. New Haven Police Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Kuehl v. KoskoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Balloli v. New Haven Police Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- King. v. HubbardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.