Legal Opinion
Eldim, Inc. v. Mullen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 15, 1999No. 96-P-1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
The defendants appeal from a Superior Court judgment awarding the plaintiff damages and attorney’s fees for contempt of an injunction requiring the defendants to comply with the terms of a noncompetition agreement between the plaintiff and defendants. The defendants claim that the terms of the injunction were not clear; their activities did not violate the injunction; the plaintiff failed to prove lost profits; there was no basis for return of the noncompetition payments; and the *126evidence regarding the plaintiff’s legal fees was insufficient. We affirm the judgment, except for the matter of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Air Technology Corp. v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Conservation Commission v. PachecoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Gray v. Tacason (Tacason)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2015
- Ventresca v. Town Manager of BillericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- T.M. v. L.H.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Douglas v. PrattDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.