Legal Opinion

Bartels v. Biernat

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 24, 1975No. 75-C-704PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WARREN, District Judge.

This is an action whereby certain mobility-handicapped persons seek to gain greater access to the public mass transportation system which has been designed for service in Milwaukee County. The named plaintiffs are mobility-handicapped individuals who reside in Milwaukee County; the suit is brought on behalf of them and a group of some 2,000 other people, allegedly similarly situated.

The defendants include members of the Milwaukee County Transit Board, as officials charged with responsibility for the operation and maintenance of mass transportation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Orantes-Hernandez v. SmithDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1982
  3. Sites v. McKenzieDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1976
  4. Toussaint v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
  5. Lloyd v. Illinois Regional Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API