Legal Opinion
Toussaint v. Rushen
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 14, 1983No. C-73-1422-SAWPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
553 F.Supp. 1365 (1983)
Joseph TOUSSAINT, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Ruth RUSHEN, et al., Defendants.
No. C-73-1422-SAW.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
January 14, 1983.
Sidney Wolinsky, Public Advocates, Morris Baller, Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, San Francisco, Cal., James F. Smith, Sacramento, Cal., Paul Comiskey, Smith, Snedeker & Comiskey, Bernard Zimmerman, David Lew, Frances Ternus, Sanford Jay Rosen, Rosen & Remcho, San Francisco, Cal., Michael Satris, San Quentin, Cal., for plaintiffs.
James B. Cuneo, Deputy Atty. Gen., Cal. Dept. of Justice, San…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Toussaint v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Fillmore v. OrdonezDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Miles v. BellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Comer v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.