Universal Company v. Reel Mop Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
Action for an accounting and damages for breach of an express contract. Plaintiff was denied recovery below and appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
In October 1938 the G. N.. Burg Company, alleged to have been engaged in sales promotion, and the defendant, Reel Mop Corporation, a manufacturing company, entered into a contract providing that the Burg company was to have the exclusive right to sell defendant’s products and that it inaugurate a sales program; that defendant could continue to sell directly to its customers until December 31, 3938, during which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sykes v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Lund v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Jones v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.