Legal Opinion
Lewis Invisible Stitch Mach. Co. v. Popper
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 10, 1941No. 174PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
Several years ago the appellant obtained in the above entitled suit an injunction restraining the appellee from manufacturing, using or selling combined sewing and pinking machines embodying the invention covered by certain claims of two patents to Gruman, Nos. 1,891,308 and 1,909,346, which the district court held valid and infringed in 5 F.Supp. 859. Thereafter in 1935 the parties made a settlement by the terms of which the appellee was granted a license to make and sell such machines within a specified limited territory. The present controversy arises out of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Radio Corporation v. Cable Radio Tube CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Gordon v. Turco-Halvah Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- National Metal Molding Co. v. Tubular Woven Fabric Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1916
- American Pastry Products Corp. v. United Products Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Panther Pumps & Equipment Company, Inc., Now Morrison Pump Co., Inc. v. Hydrocraft, Inc., Paul W. Schlosser and Edward DrathCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- William Baltz, an Individual, and Wonder Products Company, a Corporation v. The Fair, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Sterling Fur Dyers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Holmes v. Atlas Garage Door Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Kinatome Patents Corp. v. Herman A. De Vry, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.