Legal Opinion

Kinatome Patents Corp. v. Herman A. De Vry, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 25, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

■This is a motion to punish the defendant for a contempt of court for failing to comply with the terms of a consent decree in a suit for patent infringement. The consent decree, dated July 22, 1938, is annexed to the motion papers. It contains in the injunctive paragraph a limiting clause — “except as heretofore licensed”. No copy of the license agreement was annexed to the motion papers. Concerning the license agreement, the moving affidavit of plaintiff’s president states:

“That, as referred to in said decree, the defendant, by written license dated June 15, 1938, did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis Invisible Stitch Mach. Co. v. PopperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API