Legal Opinion

Adams v. Greenwich Water Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 7, 1951PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The plaintiffs, who are riparian owners along the Mianus River in Greenwich, instituted this action to enjoin the defendant from diverting, and from attempting to take by condemnation, any of the waters of that stream. The defendant filed a cross complaint claiming a declaratory judgment determining whether it has the right to condemn the water rights although part of the benefits may accrue to inhabitants of Port Chester, New York.

The finding, with minor additions which must be made, establishes the following facts: The properties of the plaintiffs are estates with elaborate private…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Board of Water Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. In Re the Appraisal of Damages of TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hammerberg v. LeinertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Berin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Katz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API