Legal Opinion

Saddler v. California Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1925No. Docket No. 4826PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

On or before February 19, 1921, the plaintiff had in the defendant bank an interest-bearing account, known as a special ordinary account, subject to check. Her business in connection with that account was conducted by George H. Wilson, her attorney in fact. On the above-stated date Wilson deposited for her in defendant bank a cashier’s check, made to her order by the First National Bank of Desdemona, Texas, in the sum of #3,640, and the bank credited that amount on her pass-book. On October 6, 1921 (said deposited amount not having been theretofore withdrawn), plaintiff presented to defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Luckehe v. First Nat. Bk. of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Nicoletti v. Bank of Los BanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API