Legal Opinion
Arcadia Development Corp. v. County of Hennepin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 3, 1995No. C0-94-574PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
This case concerns the appropriate interest rate applicable to property tax refunds made pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 278.08, subd. 2 (1992). The issue presented on appeal is whether the Minnesota Tax Court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the County of Hennepin (County) on the question whether the County properly applied Minn.Stat. § 549.09 (1994) to calculate the interest due on property tax refunds. We affirm the decision of the tax court.
Arcadia Development Corporation (Arcadia), Computer Parts and Services, Inc. (CPSI), and Jerry’s Enterprises (Jerry’s)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nagaraja v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Beck v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. RitschelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- General Mills, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Lessard v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- National Union v. CargillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Owatonna Clinic-Mayo Health System v. Medical Protective Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.