Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 18, 2010No. 10-60CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CLASS CERTIFICATION
BRADEN, Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion And Order resolves Plaintiffs’ Motion For Class Certification, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC 23”). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs have established, by a preponderance of the evidence, each of the requirements of RCFC 23. In making this determination, the court reminds the parties that no decision has been made as to the substantive merits.
I. RELEVANT FACTS.1
Plaintiffs2 are current or former General Schedule (“GS”) employees of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Douglas R. Bigelow Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Starr International Company, Inc., on Its Behalf and on Behalf of a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Demons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.