Legal Opinion
Fleischman v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in Podiatry
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 3, 1990No. 7407; 7752PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
In this opinion we dispose of two related appeals by the plaintiff, Gary Fleischman. Fleischman was sanctioned on three separate occasions by the Connecticut board of examiners in podiatry (board) and unsuccessfully appealed those decisions to the Superior Court. Fleischman appealed all three cases to this court, and we have already denied one such appeal. Fleischman v. Board of Examiners in Podiatry, 22 Conn. App. 181, 576 A.2d 1302 (1990) (Fleischman I).
In Fleischman I, we rejected the plaintiffs arguments that the board (1) lacked jurisdiction because it was improperly constituted and (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Manor Development Corp. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Town of North StoningtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Hanes v. Bridgeport Board of Education, No. Cv95 32 88 50 S (Sep. 4, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998