Legal Opinion
Jaynes v. Austin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 25, 2001No. 99-6226, 99-6409, 00-5102PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals orders that enforce settlement agreements, require Defendant *423to sign releases, and award attorney fees to plaintiffs’ counsel. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
On November 6, 1997, Jerald K. Jaynes (“Mr.Jaynes”) and Gordon H. Newman (“Mr.Newman”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued Robert Austin, (“Defendant” ), Rolich Corporation (“Rolich”), and Unaka Company, Incorporated (“Unaka”) (collectively “Corporate Defendants”) in federal court for wrongful termination. Rolich and Unaka were dismissed, and all but two counts against Austin were dismissed. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Tocci v. Antioch UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Loesel v. City of FrankenmuthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Anderson-Santos v. Kent, County ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Bennett v. Amazon.Com Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.