Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 2, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeals from Linn District Court. — IIon. F. O. Ellison, Judge. The nature of the controversy and. the material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

More than twenty years ago Susan Brown and her son, N. E. Brown, each being part owner of a milldam and water power at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in which property the present plaintiffs also owned fractional interests, -commenced an action in equity for partition thereof. On August 27, 1889, an interlocutory decree was entered fixing their respective shares. These shares, so far as the present controversy is concerned, may be stated to have been as follows: Susan Brown, fifty-seven sixty-fourths; N. E. Brown, two sixty-fourths; W. S. Cooper, four sixty-fourths; and the Anchor Mill Company, one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hurst v. SelvidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Brown v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Calvert v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Stackable v. Estate of StackableMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shelangowski v. SchrackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ORD v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sagen v. GudmansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Indra v. WigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. Benedict v. NielsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API