Legal Opinion

Turk v. Carnahan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1900No. 3,170PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

—Appellant purchased of appellees certain personal property under an agreement that the title should remain in them until the full purchase price was paid. Notes were executed for the purchase price, and the note in suit was given in lieu of the original notes, after default in payment had been made and upon an extension of time being given. The complaint avers the execution of the note, that it is due and unpaid, and that a reasonable attorney’s fee would be $10.

The note sued on describes the property, and contains a clause that the title to the property shall remain in appellees till it is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Hays v. Jordan & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Manson v. DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. FleshmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Poirier Manufacturing Co. v. KittsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kilmer v. Moneyweight Scale Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Igleheart Bros., Inc. v. John Deere Plow Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API