Legal Opinion

Haco Drilling Co. v. Burchette

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1961No. 38996Published

1Opinion of the Court

364 P.2d 674 (1961)

HACO DRILLING CO., Inc., Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Oscar Ray BURCHETTE, Defendant in Error.

No. 38996.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 6, 1961.

Mart Brown, Rex H. Holden, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Gomer Smith Jr., Oklahoma City, T.R. Benedum, Norman, for defendant in error.

DAVISON, Justice.

This action was brought by Oscar Ray Burchette (plaintiff) against Haco Drilling Co., Inc., and Sam J. Whitlock, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas W. Hughes, Deceased, for damages resulting from the collision of two automobiles. Plaintiff alleged that at all of the times mentioned…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Pipeline Co. v. CrauthersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. CarstenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Shebester, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Haco Drilling Co. v. BurchetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Roring v. Hoggard Ex Rel. HoggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API